On 6/2/05, Konstantin Ryabitsev <mricon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I cannot deny that the last 2 weeks spent packaging nonfree > software has greatly influenced this post. :) That, plus the sad fact > that even though several vendors provide .rpm files, they are utterly > unusable because they try to be installable on as many things as > possible, and always end up sucking on all. so basically the fap layer is only really a target for nonfree software... but clearly its doomed to fail because the pre-existing conditions for it to be used successfully are not going to be met if proprietary vendors can't package rpms correctly.. the fap layer doesn't help. if proprietary vendors can't create repos correctly.. the fap layer doesn't help. I have very little faith in proprietary vendors doing either correctly. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
