On 6/2/05, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > c. Their software is licensed so that it cannot be put in Extras. > > yep. that's the use case I figured from the .fap file you were > describing before. Yes, I cannot deny that the last 2 weeks spent packaging nonfree software has greatly influenced this post. :) That, plus the sad fact that even though several vendors provide .rpm files, they are utterly unusable because they try to be installable on as many things as possible, and always end up sucking on all. -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Zlotniks, INC "Выслухаў мядзьведзь казку і адарваў сабе хвост." -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
