Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default > locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient. > Would it make sense to do the same in Fedora? I think it makes sense (why default to the older, slower implementation?), but just like Debian, I think we should not install locate by default to begin with. See Josh Triplett's arguments which I can only fully second: https://lwn.net/ml/debian-devel/YB+FvRPtuJmroUTT@localhost/ > I prepared a package [1, 2]. The code seems nice and clean enough. > I'd be happy to take it through review, but I'm not particular keen > on long-term maintenance… If you want it to be the default, it should install %{_bindir}/updatedb, not %{_bindir}/plocate-updatedb, and it should Obsolete mlocate, just like mlocate Obsoletes slocate. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
