Re: What next?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Hearn (mike@xxxxxxx) said: 
> > libtool.. bigger question. But we can get pkg-config to do this right if we
> > spend 2 days on it.
> 
> This was already discussed on xdg-list and by James Henstridge. Pkg-config
> and libtool aren't broken, they do this for portability. The GNU linker
> doesn't need you to enumerate every library in the image but some
> (unbelievably) do. 
> 
> Pkg-config files can't contain --as-needed directly because it's not
> portable also. 

Whyever on earth not?

The upstream distributed pkg-config files, sure.

But if you have a local pkg-config file for the current linker,
the vagaries of the Solaris linker are completely irrelevant.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux