On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 7:03 AM Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > > > That does make sense to me... and perhaps this fits in with that we > > > generate debuginfo/debugsource rpms when we build something. We just expand things > > > to also produce a buildinfo subpackage (of course then we need tools to > > > gather them/put them in a repo/allow users to install them, etc). > > Can you expand on that last part? Are you referring to some automation > that pulls debuginfo rpms into a separate repository? I guess the > buildinfo one should go into sources repo, right? > > > > Then, you could 'dnf install foobar-buildinfo-1.0-1.fc35' and possibly > > > there could be tools that would read that .buildinfo and feed the > > > src.rpm into mock or whatever with that input? > > > > > > > That is, of course, another valid strategy, and may make sense given > > the archful nature of some things. > > New sub-package sounds like a good idea. Is it ok to package it as a > single file in /usr/src/buildinfo? > Sure, we'd probably have buildinfo packages in a separate repository like we do debuginfo packages. Most people will never use them. The advantage of -buildinfo packages is that we can start with a buildinfo file and actually add more as we want to have more complete build records, including macros, environment variables, etc. -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx