On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:56:43PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 9:23 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:17:28AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > > > Does it make sense? > > > > That does make sense to me... and perhaps this fits in with that we > > generate debuginfo/debugsource rpms when we build something. We just expand things > > to also produce a buildinfo subpackage (of course then we need tools to > > gather them/put them in a repo/allow users to install them, etc). Can you expand on that last part? Are you referring to some automation that pulls debuginfo rpms into a separate repository? I guess the buildinfo one should go into sources repo, right? > > Then, you could 'dnf install foobar-buildinfo-1.0-1.fc35' and possibly > > there could be tools that would read that .buildinfo and feed the > > src.rpm into mock or whatever with that input? > > > > That is, of course, another valid strategy, and may make sense given > the archful nature of some things. New sub-package sounds like a good idea. Is it ok to package it as a single file in /usr/src/buildinfo? -- Best Regards, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki Invisible Things Lab
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
