Re: Soname bump for clang-libs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 4:42 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
> > On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the soname
> >> of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusual for clang, since the
> >> soname will change without bumping the major version number.
> >>
> >> I will be rebuilding the affected packages, so no action is needed from
> >> package maintainers.  Ideally, the rebuilds will be done in a side tag,
> >> however, depending on when the mass rebuild starts, they may have to be done
> >> immediately after the mass rebuild completes, which could result in a
> >> temporary break of these packages.
> >>
> >
> > The new clang builds are ready, and I've done test scratch builds, so I'm
> > going to start building these packages in the side-tag now.
>
> Is this relevant?
>
> nothing provides libclang-cpp.so.11()(64bit) needed by lldb-11.1.0-1.rc1.fc34.x86_64
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919667
>
>
> nothing provides libclang.so.11()(64bit) needed by qt6-doctools-6.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64
> nothing provides libclang.so.11(LLVM_11)(64bit) needed by
> qt6-doctools-6.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919668

Looks like some builds were made for the side tag but are not
contained in the update, for example lldb-11.1.0-2.rc2.fc34:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1672970

Maybe others were built without running koji wait-repo when necessary?
Or the bodhi update was created while some builds were still running?

- lldb-11.1.0-1.rc1.fc34 was built against llvm-11.1.0-1.rc1.fc34,
which was superseded by llvm-11.1.0-2.rc2.fc34, but was submitted to
bodhi.
- lldb-11.1.0-2.rc2.fc34 was built against llvm-11.1.0-2.rc2.fc34 in
the side tag, but it was not part of the bodhi update, and is still
sitting in the side tag.

I don't think many packages depend on lldb and qt6-doctools, but it
would probably be good to clean this up before the mass rebuild starts
nonetheless.

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux