On 23. 01. 21 2:18, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 1/21/21 7:28 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Hi,
We are going to be building clang-11.1.0 for rawhide, which changes the soname
of libclang.so and libclang-cpp.so. This is unusual for clang, since the
soname will change without bumping the major version number.
I will be rebuilding the affected packages, so no action is needed from
package maintainers. Ideally, the rebuilds will be done in a side tag,
however, depending on when the mass rebuild starts, they may have to be done
immediately after the mass rebuild completes, which could result in a
temporary break of these packages.
The new clang builds are ready, and I've done test scratch builds, so I'm
going to start building these packages in the side-tag now.
Is this relevant?
nothing provides libclang-cpp.so.11()(64bit) needed by lldb-11.1.0-1.rc1.fc34.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919667
nothing provides libclang.so.11()(64bit) needed by qt6-doctools-6.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64
nothing provides libclang.so.11(LLVM_11)(64bit) needed by
qt6-doctools-6.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919668
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
