On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 10:01 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:53 pm, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Ultimately it's software bugs and if the software is open it's a > > fixable problem. Are there bugs filed? Because I've always found the > > IBM team that are involved in Fedora are pretty active on addressing > > those sorts of problems. > > Where do you want architecture-specific bugs to be filed? Is there some > component in Bugzilla for ppc64le issues? As per standard package process each architecture has a tracking bug where you file a bug against the package and link it to the bug for the architecture as a blocker. The POWER blocker alias is PPCTracker [1] Peter [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071880 > WebKit disables its heap security features ppc64le due to the 64 KB > page size. But reporting the bug to upstream would be pointless, > because upstream does not care about ppc64le. Reporting the bug against > webkit2gtk3 on Red Hat Bugzilla would mean reporting to myself, also > not very useful. But if you link it to the PPCTracker you'll find the associated team looks at it. Having done a number of architecture boot straps and dealt with various teams at IBM during that they are quite responsive and from my experience once they're aware of issues they engage with upstream and get things fixed. Peter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
