On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 20:43, Dan Čermák <dan.cermak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > clime <clime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > ...snip... > >> > > >> > $ preproc-rpmspec pkg.spec.rpkg # prints rendered spec to stdout, > >> > pkg.spec.rpkg is a spec template > >> > >> This would be a viable workaround, but a workaround nevertheless. Since > >> I am not frequently rebuilding Fedora rpms outside of mock, koji & copr, > >> I cannot tell how much of a show-stopper that is though. At least I > >> think that the benefits of the change need to be pretty big to outweigh > >> this potential downside. > > > > If I may ask, why do you think using preproc-rpmspec is a workaround? > > I consider it a workaround, because it adds another step to the > packaging process outside of koji & copr: it still works, but you have > to go through extra steps. Yes, there is an extra step that would be wrapped in higher-level tooling. But when you said "workaround", I was thinking that you actually saw the correct solution because "workaround" is imho used usually when someone can't or don't want to solve things the right way so he/she takes a shortcut. So I was curious what you think is "the right way" here. > > > Cheers, > > Dan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
