On 04. 01. 21 12:26, Petr Menšík wrote:
I had not time to coordinate rebuilt before Christmas, so I left it intentionally without build. It was built by Jeff Law one day before I departed to vacation. I haven't noticed that.
As a matter of opinion (i.e. this is not a policy, but my own views), I think that the state of distgit should always be "good" and any provenpackager should safely assume that rebuilding any package does not cause damage.
If I need to rebuild many packages because of a dependency, I should not need to explore if the latest commits are "ready". A work in progress should be left in a pull request.
Obviously, this does not always work, because sometimes change in distgit is necessary for a rebuild from a side tag, but in most cases I think we should avoid both "I've pushed a breaking upgrade but I haven't built it" or "I've pushed a broken commit and will push more later" approaches.
WDYT? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
