Re: thinking journal retention timelimits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> As we start a new year, I'm thinking about data retention in general. :)
>
> In my experience, it's pretty rare on an end-user laptop or desktop system for
> logs from much more than the previous boot to be interesting. Maybe I
> occasionally want to look back a little while to see if a problem just
> started. It's exceedingly rare that I need (or want) to look back more than
> a month.
>
> Right now, we don't set MaxRetentionSec, so journal expiry on Workstation is
> entirely based on disk usage.
>
> Logs can accidentally contain sensitive data, and it's just plain faster to
> work with them when there's less. I propose we set this to something like
> six months by default.

That sounds very reasonable to me. As long as we document this properly,
anyone who wants to keep logs for ever, can change the setting
themselves pretty easily.


Cheers,

Dan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux