Re: full file paths in the dependency metadata [was Re: Fedora 34 Change: DNF/RPM Copy on Write enablement for all variants (System-Wide Change)]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 01:47:19PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> As someone who has to package for multiple distributions, I would
> oppose any attempt to cripple DNF to stop supporting file dependencies
> properly. I *aggressively* use file dependencies to avoid having to
> litter my spec files with package name dependencies across RH/Fedora,
> SUSE, Mandriva/Mageia, and others.

Do you have examples outside of /etc, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin?

Also, if you _are_ using arbitrary file dependencies, that renders the other
part about opportunistic download of these deps kind of moot, since they'll
have to be frequently, right?

Again, I'm not kidding about 95% of the dep points being filenames. It's
huge! I don't think that's a good price at all to make everyone pay
constantly for packaging convenience. Better to convince packagers to put in
cross-distro "Provides" or something.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux