On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 12:55 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > For what's it worth I think that packages that only use make via cmake should > not have an explcit dependency on make. Packages that use make directly should > have an explicit dependency on make (even if they already BR cmake). Does that mean that if the requires: make that is currently in the cmake package that was added due to rhbz#1862014 is removed (as has been proposed since ninja is a valid alternative) that you are fine with packagers having to go fix their packages? Or would you expect another pass across all packages to add a BR: make to be done? If the later, it makes sense to me to do it once (when someone is willing to do the work) to prepare for any cmake cleanup(s). _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
