Dne 04. 12. 20 v 0:55 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
On 12/3/20 9:52 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:Dne 02. 12. 20 v 22:49 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):Dne 02. 12. 20 v 17:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):Why these requires does not follow some standard naming convention possibly with some prefix?What do you mean? Like external:python3-foo?Yes, that was the idea. I can imagine, that the reason for your proposal is probably the not so straight forward transition from upstream name "foo" to Fedora name "python3-foo". But I am not expert on Python naming conventions.A Python package called <name> provides python3dist(<name>) (where <name> is converted to a canonical form, defined by upstream rules). But the package name is completely artificial. There are guidelines, but:1) historically, not all packages follow them 2) for human reasons, not all packages follow them3) there are packages that follow guidelines but still make this difficult.e.g. applications can be called "app" and not "python3-app".
I understand. But my point is that it might be better to emphasize the default convention. Of course exceptions might be necessary.
Vít
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
