On 12/3/20 9:52 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 12. 20 v 22:49 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Dne 02. 12. 20 v 17:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Why these requires does not follow some standard naming convention possibly
with some prefix?
What do you mean? Like external:python3-foo?
Yes, that was the idea. I can imagine, that the reason for your proposal is
probably the not so straight forward transition from upstream name "foo" to
Fedora name "python3-foo". But I am not expert on Python naming conventions.
A Python package called <name> provides python3dist(<name>) (where <name> is
converted to a canonical form, defined by upstream rules). But the package name
is completely artificial. There are guidelines, but:
1) historically, not all packages follow them
2) for human reasons, not all packages follow them
3) there are packages that follow guidelines but still make this difficult.
e.g. applications can be called "app" and not "python3-app".
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
