On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 01:20:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a): > > > >False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the > >(at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing > >BuildRequires: gcc ? > > > > > > Do I understand correctly, that gcc requires make [0]? Therefore at > this stage, it should be enough to have `BuildRequires: gcc` and > hence such packages should not be on your list? Please don't rely on gcc requiring make. This is an internal implementation detail of the gcc package, and hopefully one day we'll be able to drop this dependency. If a package uses make directly, it should BR:make itself. Zbyszek > I am asking, because for example rubygem-bcrypt is on the list while > requiring gcc [1]. This is just one package I have checked (but > actually I have added make to the ruby package, later wondering if > it was necessary), but I suspect that also other rubygem- packages > are similar case. Could you please make sure if they should or > should not be on your list? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
