Re: Mass spec file change: Adding BuildRequires: make

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Dne 01. 12. 20 v 2:37 Tom Stellard napsal(a):

False positive because they use gcc which was crashing due to the (at the time) missing make dependency. Are these packages missing
BuildRequires: gcc ?



Do I understand correctly, that gcc requires make [0]? Therefore at this stage, it should be enough to have `BuildRequires: gcc` and hence such packages should not be on your list?

I am asking, because for example rubygem-bcrypt is on the list while requiring gcc [1]. This is just one package I have checked (but actually I have added make to the ruby package, later wondering if it was necessary), but I suspect that also other rubygem- packages are similar case. Could you please make sure if they should or should not be on your list?


Vít


[0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gcc/blob/master/f/gcc.spec#_252

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-bcrypt/blob/master/f/rubygem-bcrypt.spec#_16

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x0CE09EE79917B87C.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux