On 11/29/20 3:22 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > for python_libdir in `find "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" -type d|grep -E
> "/usr/lib(64)?/python[0-9]\.[0-9]$"`;
>
> ... which should use prefix instead of hardcoding /usr (or alternatively
scan
> both /usr and /app).
Can do. However, one question: When we find code in /app/lib(64)/pythonX.Y, do
we bytecompile with /usr/bin/pythonX.Y or /app/bin/pythonX.Y?
Awesome, thanks!
It depends: for python2.7 (gimp flatpak) we use python2.7 re-built for /app
prefix (so it's bundled with the app's flatpak), but for regular python3 we just
use the /usr-installed one that's part of the flatpak runtime (the runtime uses
/usr prefix and app flatpaks use /app prefix).
Would it be possible to just use %__python2 and %__python3 macros for
byte-compiling? These are always set correctly by the flatpak macros, no matter
if the interpreter is in /app or /usr.
Not in the way this is currently done, no. The script detects a
Python-version-specific path and uses that Python version.
E.g. even if %__python3 is set to /usr/bin/pypy3, when the script fins files in
/usr/lib(64)/python3.9, it compiles them with python3.9.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
