Re: OGRE soname bump on rawhide Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers (hundreds of freshly orphaned F33FTBFS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2020-11-24 at 10:35 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 11/24/20 10:25 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 11/23/20 3:56 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Sorry , 
> > > I updated ogre in rawhide to ogre-1.12.6 ( the PR 
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ogre/pull-request/1 was ready
> > > 5
> > > months ago ) 
> > > 
> > > I did a wrong repoquery. I though ogre didn't have any
> > > dependency. I
> > > did a query that only query rpmfusion repos, instead query fedora
> > > repos 
> > > 
> > > I hope does not make much trouble , so we need rebuild [1] based
> > > on
> > > query [2] .
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [1]
> > > SkyX-0:0.4-28.fc33.src
> > > cegui-0:0.8.7-20.fc33.src
> > > fawkes-0:1.3.1-0.5.4923a6c.fc34.src
> > > funguloids-0:1.06-36.fc33.src
> > 
> > I'm afraid that this is not a case of a simple rebuild, ogre tends
> > to break its API every minor release (iow only bugfix releases
> > have a stable API). AFAIK this is why the previous maintainer was
> > holding
> > of on updating ogre.
> > 
> > It seems that archlinux has patches to make funguloids work with a
> > newer ogre:
> > 
> > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/funguloids/
> 
> So I took a quick peek at this and the last comments there are:
> 
>  IooNag commented on 2019-10-09 20:25	
> 
> I confirm it is broken, but I won't have time in the next few weeks
> to search what OGRE broke this time and to write a patch to make
> funguloids work again. If you would like to contribute to this
> package, I maintain it on https://github.com/fishilico/funguloids and
> can accept Pull Requests there.
> 
> Singularity commented on 2019-09-24 01:46	
> 
> Seems compiling broke once again … :(
> 
> So AFAIK the arch patches will make things work with ogre 1.11 but
> not with 1.12 :|
> 
> So it looks like this is going to require a bunch of work all over
> the place

OK, sorry again, just now I realized what you mean, it will give a
bunch of work and it will consume a bunch of time, which I don't have. 
What you suggest ? Should I rollback ogre to version 1.9 with EPOCH
bump ?

> and all apps must be tested once fixed, just fixing compilation is
> not enough, see e.g. :
> https://github.com/fishilico/funguloids/commits/master
> 
> For all the work which was necessary to make it work with 1.11.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux