On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 05:27:31PM -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 01:33:57PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > So, IMHO, relax, wait for change owners to make things testable, then > > test and file bugs and we can see where we are. There's too many > > unknowns right at this minute. > > So...you're saying that we should evaluate proposed changes, not as they > are currently written, but as they might be written at some unspcecified > later date. no. I am saying you should not look at a change and evaluate it like it's landing in stable as soon as it's approved. There will be testing. There will be bugs. If those bugs are serious enough there will be reverting and trying again later. It's a 'Hey folks, we are going to try and do this, what do you think about the approach' ? It sounds to me like everyone is fine with the general idea, they just want lots of testing. Thats great. I would definitely hope the change owners would also want that. I am pretty sure however they thought things could be stablized by f34 or they wouldn't have submitted it for f34. Anyhow, lets wait for the change owners to chime in and adjust their change from the feedback so far. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
