Re: Two questions on updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fabio Valentini wrote:
> You are kinda right, yet you are not.
> The minimum for *autokarma* is +1 for normal updates, +2 for critpath
> updates. But the message "This update can be pushed to stable if the
> maintainer wishes" does not refer to autokarma (update getting pushed
> automatically by bodhi after getting the necessary karma), but to
> maintainers pushing an update *manually* - which is *always* allowed
> for updates that got at least +2 karma, and is independent from
> "autokarma".

Well, for my updates, I normally disable autopush *and* set the stable 
threshold to 1 (why would I want it set any higher? With manual push, I can 
still decide to wait for more feedback if the +1 does not convince me, I do 
not need Bodhi to enforce that for me), and then Bodhi correctly gives me 
that "This update can be pushed to stable if the maintainer wishes" 
notification when the update gets +1 karma (unless this regressed recently).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux