Re: Two questions on updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 1:25 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Normal updates need at *least* +2 karma so they can be pushed to
> > stable *manually*.
>
> Uh, last I checked, normal updates need only +1 (and that's a good thing,
> many updates don't even get +1 in a reasonable time frame, let alone +2).
> Only critical path packages and (IIRC) EPEL need +2.

You are kinda right, yet you are not.
The minimum for *autokarma* is +1 for normal updates, +2 for critpath updates.
But the message "This update can be pushed to stable if the maintainer
wishes" does not refer to autokarma (update getting pushed
automatically by bodhi after getting the necessary karma), but to
maintainers pushing an update *manually* - which is *always* allowed
for updates that got at least +2 karma, and is independent from
"autokarma".

Fabio
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux