* Tom Stellard: > On 11/9/20 1:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Miro Hrončok: >> >>> On 11/9/20 7:05 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: >>>> Thanks for clarifying. So it does sound like gcc will need at >>>> dependency on make. If you do decide to use a weak dependency for this, >>>> then I think I will need to update the proposal to BuildRequire: >>>> make when gcc is used, so that we don't cause a performance >>>> regression in the builds. >>> >>> Well, we can add: >>> >>> Requires: (make if redhat-rpm-config) >>> >>> To gcc. >> Or >> Requires: (make if gcc) >> to redhat-rpm-config. Given that the requirement actually comes >> from >> the -flto usage in redhat-rpm-config, that seems more reasonable to me. >> > > This make sense, but does this work if redhat-rpm-config and gcc are > installed in separate transactions? We already use Requires: (annobin if gcc) and that doesn't seem to cause any problems. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
