Re: patch applied without package maintainers' approve

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:02:12PM +0800, Honggang LI wrote:
> The patch maybe useful or fix something. But the divergence between
> upstream and Fedora rawhide is what I don't want to see, because
> such divergence is source of regression issues.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rdma-core/c/59a8e2e0d0ddba785fc79c4731e0b8685893458b?branch=master

It only changes how the software is packaged in Fedora, by making a
separate libibverbs RPM package that can be installed separately from
rdma-core.  There is nothing to upstream since this is purely an RPM
build change.

> What I should to do with that commit? Just blindly revert it?

It seems useful to keep the change for minimizing unnecessary
dependencies by consumers of the libibverbs library (such as the
libpcap package mentioned in the commit).
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux