On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:57:32AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 08:52, <ycollette.nospam@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The make package use 539k of space. And for gcc + C++ it's more than 30 Mo. > > Does it really worth the effort on changing all the dependent packages ? > > > > > Personally I am getting tired of this death of the buildroot by a million > cuts. Could we just 'engineer' the build root to have what we want in it > versus these continual sculptor like cuts to a block of marble to try and > get the inner statue out? Because in around 10-20 more Fedora releases > someone is going to say 'this is a pile of rubble' and start on a new > block. Do we need a default build root package set at all ? Can it be the empty set, and then have RPMs specify their full set of build requires without assuming any defaults ? "fast death by one big cut" instead of "slow death by a million cuts", which will put an end to repeated feature proposals to trim out some new thing from the build root. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
