* Jakub Jelinek: > The thing is that GCC is a moving target at that point, while you can fix up > packages to deal with GCC at certain date, in a week or two you might need > to do it again, or there could be ABI changes etc. > Which is why I'm suggesting at least end of GCC stage1, which still doesn't > guarantee any of that, at least major new features shouldn't be making it in > (unless they were posted already before that), and people start focusing on > fixing bugs (some bugs are fixed continually, but a concerted effort to fix > bugs starts at end of stage1). And ELN is different here because it has a rebuild number in the dist tag, so it is much easier to do rebuilds (bump the rebuild number, do the required builds, done). We have walked back ABI versions in Fedora rawhide in the past and know how to do it, but it requires per-package dist-git upgrades for fresh NVRs. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
