On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> * Miro Hrončok:
>
> >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were
> >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a
> >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the
> >> Default Module Streams setup.
> >
> > Should we expect an eln branch for redhat-rpm-config as well, or this
> > is still under consideration?
>
> See the earlier announcement about the z13 baseline change in ELN. Once
> we have GCC 11 in ELN, further baseline changes may be forthcoming.
> These changes can all be implemented using %{?rhel} conditionals. I do
> not see a need for a redhat-rpm-config eln branch as the result of these
> requirements.
>
> I do not think the Fedora Change process applies to parts of %{?rhel}
> conditionals that are inactive in Fedora. In principle, it would make
> my life easier if such changes had to pass public Fesco-like review, but
> I feel it's too late for such a policy change for the Fedora 34 and 35
> cycles.
The Fedora 34 change submission deadline isn't until January, so
there's plenty of time.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
