On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 1:28 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Miro Hrončok: > > >> It is also not the only one, which we can handle through ELN. We were > >> considering the update of the baseline of the x86 cpu's to be such a > >> feature, but then it was discarded. The other example would be the > >> Default Module Streams setup. > > > > Should we expect an eln branch for redhat-rpm-config as well, or this > > is still under consideration? > > See the earlier announcement about the z13 baseline change in ELN. Once > we have GCC 11 in ELN, further baseline changes may be forthcoming. > These changes can all be implemented using %{?rhel} conditionals. I do > not see a need for a redhat-rpm-config eln branch as the result of these > requirements. > > I do not think the Fedora Change process applies to parts of %{?rhel} > conditionals that are inactive in Fedora. In principle, it would make > my life easier if such changes had to pass public Fesco-like review, but > I feel it's too late for such a policy change for the Fedora 34 and 35 > cycles. The Fedora 34 change submission deadline isn't until January, so there's plenty of time. -- 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx