On Mon, 2020-10-05 at 13:35 -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > This seems like it sort of overlaps a bit with what the abrt retrace > > server does. It's not the same, but in order to do what it does, the > > retrace server *does* need to act as a remote provider of debuginfo. I > > wonder if it's possible to combine these somehow? > > As I understand it, the retrace server doesn't serve debuginfo - it > consumes it. An exception appears to be the "symbol transfer" machinery > (faf/pull/387 ?), but even there it appears to memoize individual symbol > table lookup results, as opposed to transferring debuginfo dwarf files. Well, I guess it doesn't exactly serve it out: rather, you send the retrace server a coredump and it generates a backtrace locally, using a store of debuginfo. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
