On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 12:08:19PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > Clearly, there is a case for making systemd-resolved "default with > an option to opt-out". It makes no sense that these deployments > must install and ensure to then disable and keep disabled, the > systemd-resolved daemon. I fully agree that an opt-out should be possible. I don't think anyone suggested differently. On normal upgrades following the transition to F33, nothing special needs to be done. The only exception is the first upgrade to F33, where we reset systemd-resolved.service enablement and adjust resolv.conf symlink. Those changes are conditionalized on systemd-resolved.service being enabled in presets. To opt out, create a local preset which disables systemd-resolved. I now added a section about this to the Change page: https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes%2Fsystemd-resolved&type=revision&diff=589756&oldid=588639 (There's also the question of changes to /etc/nsswitch.conf. Those are currently done unconditionally based on the premise that nss-resolve has no effect if systemd-resolved.service is not running. We can adjust that too if needed.) Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
