On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 02:15:34PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Wednesday, September 30, 2020 1:19:51 PM WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > It actually queries bodhi and failing to find things in it, it fallsback to > > mdapi normally. > > Potential bug in the logic? > > Another example: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/texlive So after some search the answer is simple. There was no recent build of that package that went through bodhi, so the code falls back to mdapi. mdapi has no f34 branches: https://mdapi.fedoraproject.org/branches I'm looking at telling the api endpoint gathering the info to do something like: if the most recent Fedora release is not listed in mdapi's branches, consider it to be "rawhide". It seems to work, though the output surprises me a little bit: Fedora 34 texlive-tcolorbox-27.fc33 mdapi finds that the version of texlive is "tcolorbox" https://mdapi.fedoraproject.org/rawhide/srcpkg/texlive Not quite sure what's going on there. Pierre _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
