Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Di, 29.09.20 16:51, Petr Menšík (pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> > I am just saying: Fedora cannot be focussed on just working for people
> > who have a competent company admin and use their laptops in
> > company networks only. We must have something that works well in
> > company networks, as in home networks as in cafe wifis and suchlike.
> >
> > Client-side DNSSEC only works in a subset of the "competent network
> > admin" scenario, but not in the cafe wifi scenario or the home lan
> > scenario.
> Can you prove this claim somehow?
>
> Is there list of cafe wifi scenarios and home lan scenarios, you are
> referring to?

I can give you an address of a local Cafe here with a non-working
DNSSEC. I am pretty sure where you live they have plenty of those
cafes too.

Or German ICE trains public wifi doesn't allow DNSSEC.

> With explanation how resolved fixes them if possible?

Our fix: we do not do DNSSEC by default.

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux