Re: This is bad, was Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: systemd-resolved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mo, 28.09.20 22:54, Björn Persson (Bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> 
> > It can work in company-scope if the company has competent network
> > admins. My local DNS server at home resolves local hostnames to private
> > IPv4 addresses in the 192.168/16 block. Clients on the Internet see
> > another view. Both views are DNSsec-signed, and validation works fine.
> > There's no reason why this setup wouldn't work on a corporate network.
> > The key is to use a domain that is actually registered to the company,
> > not some made-up TLD like "internal" or whatever the incompetent
> > network admins come up with.  
> 
> You never take your laptop outside to a cafe or so? You never
> connected it to something that is not your home or office network?

A cafe is company-scope? I'm not sure whether that counts as moving the
goalposts or changing the subject, but neither is a constructive way to
discuss a technical topic.

Björn Persson

Attachment: pgpYfGWgXkWpG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signatur

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux