Re: Proposing an EPEL packaging SIG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 14. 09. 20 v 15:01 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> Dne 14. 09. 20 v 12:03 Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 10:35:18AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 14. 09. 20 v 10:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
>>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:50:45AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>> Reading this proposal and with the EPEL8 experience, where there was not
>>>>> even wiki page, where I could state that I don't care about EPEL and I
>>>>> had to reply into every BZ independently, wouldn't it make sense to move
>>>>> EPEL into its own dist-git namespace?
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess that in the CVS days, having EPEL branch was fine. During PkgDB
>>>>> days, where we could assign maintainer to each branch, it was still
>>>>> fine. But since we lost this ability, isn't it time to rethink the
>>>>> setup?
>>>> We have the ability back, see the answers from Neal Gompa.
>>> Well, yes, right. But apparently, it is not fully working. E.g. looking
>>> at Ruby [1], it says I am EPEL maintainer while there is certainly not
>>> EPEL branch. Also, there might be EPEL maintainer (actually Pagure lists
>>> just BZ assignee), but I am not sure if they are listed between
>>> "members" or not. I cannot set my preferred default. So there is still
>>> lot to desire.
>> You're speaking about the bugzilla overrides, that in practice are entirely
>> separated from granting access to the epel* branches to someone.
>> If you go on the project's settings, click to add an user or group, you'll see
>> the "collaborator" access level with which you can give someone commit access
>> on one or more branches (comma separated or using a pattern, for example epel*).
>
> Ok, nice. Didn't know this because one could find it by accident.
>
> Trying this, I immediately got "Fatal Error (500)" and now I can 


can't obviously.


Vít

> access settings. So now I'd appreciate if you can fix
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-gem2rpm/settings for me.
>
> Anyway, I don't want to manage collaborators. I want anybody to maintain
> EPEL packages without me knowing about it.
>
>
> Vít
>
>
>>
>> Pierre
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux