Re: F34 Change proposal: Remove support for SELinux runtime disable (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:38 AM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 7:33 AM Richard Hughes <hughsient@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:17, Tom Hughes <tom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Speaking from personal experience, I've wasted days over the last
> > > > decade trying to debug a locally installed system service that was not
> > > > working where there were no messages in any of the logs (e.g. no AVCs)
> > > > -- and turning off selinux at runtime magically fixed the problem.
> > >
> > > Some selinux rules are marked to not generate AVCs...
> >
> > Why!? There's sometimes no log output anywhere obvious that a syscall
> > or something was blocked. It's the reason I turn off selinux on my
> > work development machine, and I've often wasted *hours* of my life on
> > code "doing something impossible" over the last decade until a neuron
> > at the back of my brain remembers "you've not yet turned off selinux"
> > and then when I "sudo setenforce 0" it works, and I can't actually
> > file a bug as there's no indication of what selinux actually blocked
> > or why.
> >
>
> Because Red Hat customers put the SELinux policy developers into
> no-win situations: they complain about AVC denials that don't actually
> significantly break anything in *their* app and often just disable
> SELinux in those scenarios. Red Hat wants customers to use it and not
> freak out all the time, so these kinds of things get added because it
> is very hard to come up with the right rules for all cases and there's
> not enough time to work on that.
>
> (I know for a fact that more than a few dontaudit rules were the
> result of those kinds of conversations, because I witnessed them)
>
      Stupid question: if the audit just reports selinux barked but it
did not block, why completely block the reporting? Because customers
were freaking out about the entries in the audit log itself?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux