Hello Kamil,
> Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the most likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties to test and benchmark the experience themselves.
I'll provide ISO images for testing at some point. One part of this change (https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/871#request_diff) was briefly included in the Rawhide compose for testing. This resulted in reduction of the DVD and BOOT.iso size by approximately ~24MiB without changing the compression parameters. The compose is available at the URI [1]. But due to the problem identified in anaconda's dracut module, the images were unbootable. I proposed a fix to the problem in https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/2820.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 11:13 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptimizeSquashFS
>
> == Summary ==
> Improve compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem on the installation
> media.
>
...
>
> Based on the results above, I'd suggest selecting the following
> ''optimal configuration'': XZ algorithm, with block size of 1MiB and
> without BCJ filter (plain xz -b 1M, without -Xbcj x86).
> On the right, you can see the impact of the compression algorithms on
> installation time.
>
Why XZ as opposed to, say, ZSTD?
Bohdan's preference seems to be to make the images smaller. I'm in the opposite camp. I'd like to keep the images roughly the same size (or smaller, but just a bit smaller, not as small as possible) and hugely speed up the installation instead. Which means zstd in one of the configurations. Each image is downloaded just once, but installed 1+ times. And with automation and all the CI work which Fedora and Red Hat invests a lot of effort into, it can be a hundred installations from a single image (without being bound to slow USB stick transfer speeds, as in the proposal). Of course, I'm biased.
Bohdan, could you build the same image in several configurations (the most likely candidates) and share them with us? (We can host them in our QA fedorapeople space, if needed). That would allow interested parties to test and benchmark the experience themselves.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Bohdan Khomutskyi RHEL Compose release engineer EXD Software production Red Hat
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
