On 9/1/20 12:10 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 01. 09. 20 15:39, Tony Asleson wrote: >> A few weeks ago the package pywbem was updated to latest upstream >> release and exists in rawhide repo. >> >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1f878bb809 >> >> The package fails to install because of newly added dependencies that >> were introduced upstream. >> >> So previous working package was >> >> python3-pywbem-0.14.6-4.fc34.noarch >> >> >> failing to install and wouldn't work if it did >> >> python3-pywbem-1.0.1-1.fc34.noarch.rpm >> >> >> From looking at docs it would appear that utilizing epoch is the answer >> and I have that ready to go, ref. >> >> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pywbem/pull-request/5 . >> >> My question is would it be acceptable to remove the broken package from >> koji and bump and rebuild the previous working version as no one was >> able to install it anyway? > > We cannot remove the package from Koji, but yes -- when you do a new > build with higher release than the latest installbale package, you don't > need to bump (introduce) the epoch. OK, I'll strip the epoch and give it a try. Thanks, Tony _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
