Re: Switching package to fragmented default configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, August 31, 2020 11:24:57 PM MST David Tardon wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 00:08 -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday, August 29, 2020 3:36:33 PM MST Colin Walters wrote:
> > 
> > > https://blog.verbum.org/2020/08/22/immutable-%E2%86%92-reprovisionable-a
> > > nti-> hysteresis/
> > > touches on some of the benefits of "fragmented" configs.
> > 
> > 
> > Perhaps this should be done for the ostree-based systems, so it
> > doesn't much 
> > up the ones people use commonly. Have the hip new way along the side,
> > while 
> > doing things the simple, robust way elsewhere.
> 
> 
> The problem with this way is that it is simple, but *not* robust.
> That's why I have to look for .rpmnew files after every update.

That's to be expected. The package manager shouldn't destroy your config when 
the package has a different one, and it doesn't. You don't need to look for 
them though, just look at the output from `dnf` during the update.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux