On Mon, Aug 31, 2020, 05:32 Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 14:42 +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-08-30 at 12:37 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 21:31, Igor Raits <
> > ignatenkobrain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > [..]
> >
> > > Well, I tell what I see :)
> > >
> > > Compiling kitty with settings below produces this big
> > > /usr/lib64/kitty/kitty/fast_data_types.so:
> > >
> > > * Without any LTO-related flags: 4.52 MB
> > > * With -flto: 4.30 MB
> > > * With -flto -ffat-lto-objects: 4.79 MB
> > >
> > > Well, I did not run compilation multiple times but don't think it
> > > will
> > > change much.
> > >
> >
> > Comparing the size of the executable files does not make any sense.
> > You should use the "size" command.
>
> Well, I'd use `size` command if I would care what section of a file
> takes what size. In this case, I don't really care which section it is.
>
> All I care is that with -ffat-lto-objects, binary becomes bigger.
Given this isn't a correctness issue, I haven't prioritized it.
A quick look tells me all the difference is in the symbol table -- ie, the code,
data and bss sections are the same size, but the symbol table is significantly
larger. And AFAICT it's all debug symbols.
In fact, it doesn't look like the debug info was stripped at all:
[law@localhost kitty]$ objdump -h fast_data_types.so
fast_data_types.so: file format elf64-x86-64
[ ... ]
26 .debug_aranges 000001e0 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000e2b64 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
27 .debug_info 000e60c7 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 000e2d44 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
28 .debug_abbrev 00007543 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 001c8e0b 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
29 .debug_line 0007644f 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 001d034e 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
30 .debug_str 0005cab8 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0024679d 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
31 .debug_loc 000d6477 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 002a3255 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
32 .debug_ranges 0003a000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 003796cc 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
33 .debug_macro 0002b64f 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 003b36cc 2**0
CONTENTS, READONLY, DEBUGGING, OCTETS
So someone needs to figure out why debug symbols aren't being stripped. I
manually stripped the bits in kitty and after doing so the sizes of the resultant
DSOs are the same (as I'd expect them to be) across the two builds.
jeff
Is the file permission 0755? This is often a permission problem I encounter while reviewing.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
