Re: Proposed Modular Policy for Fedora ELN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:56 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
<zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:45:49AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 1:57 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21. 08. 20 10:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > >> Josh listed some of the key reasons behind default streams: that
> > > >> enterprise customers don't like to learn new commands. So default
> > > >> streams allowed us to package content with shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime
> > > >> and still `yum install foo` would install something the customer could
> > > >> use.
> > > > I guess that "shorter-than-RHEL-lifetime" is the big differentiator, i.e.
> > > > normal rpms cannot be yanked from the distribution, but a module can be.
> > >
> > > Actually AFAIK modules shipped at GA cannot be yanked from the distribution
> > > either. Certainly not in Fedora.
> >
> > That is correct; the modules cannot be removed from the distribution,
> > but the encapsulation of them in a separate delivery mechanism enables
> > the support *policy* to be different. (In particular, it's acceptable
> > from a technical perspective for customers of RHEL to keep using an
> > EOL module if they cannot transition in time; they just have to accept
> > the risks.)
>
> Well, that confirms what I wrote in the part that was snipped:
> > But technically there isn't much difference, and it's only policy that sets
> > those two cases apart. So instead of using default modules, why not adjust the
> > policy and use non-modular rpms with plain Obsoletes?
> >
> > (In fact, this simpler approach could be argued to be better, since the technology
> > to put Obsoletes in rpms is well established and understood and works nicely, while
> > stream Obsoletes are only being conceived.)
>
> I'll ask again: why not?

Well, among other things, RPM-level `Obsoletes:` will remove the
packages from the end-user system, which exactly contradicts what I
just said above.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux