Re: Test machines for s390x?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 14:01 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 2:00 PM Adam Williamson
> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2020-08-06 at 13:42 -0400, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > > Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture
> > > > left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I
> > > > can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this
> > > > requires a tedious guess-a-patch, try a scratch build, check the
> > > > result, rinse and repeat.
> > > > 
> > > > Mock (with --forcearch) is completely useless for this. The programs
> > > > just crash during the build in such a way that I can't even use
> > > > `catchsegv`, and gdb is unusable in the container. And besides, the
> > > > programs don't actually crash on real s390x anyway..
> > > > 
> > > > Just like we have test machines for other less used architectures [1],
> > > > I am wondering if there is some way we can spin up a test machine for
> > > > s390x?
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> > > 
> > > It's very strange to me that having test hardware available isn't a
> > > requirement for being a Primary architecture, or for that architecture
> > > being present in koji.  IMO we should change that going forward.
> > 
> > s390x isn't a primary arch. It's an alternative arch.
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures
> 
> That page is out of date. All architectures are effectively primary
> now, since failures for any arch block builds from releasing in Koji.

We still draw a distinction between the two, it just doesn't have that
dimension to it any more. The page even explains this in its definition
at the top. The distinction is rather smaller now, but still there.

In the release criteria we've mostly switched to using the term
"release-blocking arches", and s390x isn't one of those either. :)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux