On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 7:32 PM Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The changes should have landed _BEFORE_ mass rebuild, if the change > owner didn't have the permissions they should have done PRs for all > the packages rather than having zero direct comms to affected package > owners and having them find out of a change needed post mass rebuild > when they get generic FTBFS bugs. > > Now people have even more work to do for the unexpected mess :-( Since the changes did not land before the mass rebuild (which I agree should have been the requirement), I would presume that a responsible change owner, who agreed in the proposal to make the required changes to packages, would also take ownership of each and every related FTBFS bugzilla entry and mark it ASSIGNED (to themselves). They (knowingly) broke it, they own it. And the best way to make the packagers aware the the change owners are taking their responsibilities seriously is update the FTBFS bugzillas. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
