On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 19:26 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 12:02:22PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote: > > Looks like it's in the buildroots now. Let me know if that doesn't fix the > > problem. > > Looks as if "ar" is segfaulting again ... > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48288440 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8440/48288440/build.log > > That was built with binutils 2.35-8.fc33 Just an FYI binutils-2.35-9 is in the buildroots. It's got the fix for the LTO issue, but does not turn on LTO for binutils itself (that'll be in the -10 build). I've confirmed that the -9 build will correctly build binutils-2.35-10. I've also confirmed that the -9 build will correctly build libguestfs. I'm going to take my local -10 build and use that to build libguestfs as an additional sanity check. jeff ps. I found out why SuSE didn't stumble on these issues. They disabled LTO in binutils. Their ChangeLog says it's just the testsuite, but the implementation is for the entire build. I suspect they probably have a few packages that are either silently broken or where they've turned off LTO due to failures without a real root-cause-analysis. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
