On 21/07/20 19:12 +0100, Dave Love wrote:
Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 20/07/20 16:01 -0500, Steven Munroe wrote:
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Why are you asking fedpkg to build for f33 if you are trying to
package something for el7 and el8?
I am trying to get better turn around for myself as I have local
access to a POWER8 machine. And I was having difficulty debug the
weird failure I was seeing.
Use mock to get a clean el7 build environment on the POWER8 machine.
I'm pretty sure I said to do that a while ago, like I did when testing
the trivial patch that I didn't expect to cause such trouble.
For what it's worth, the answer to the question, if it's CentOS, is to
install centos-release-scl-rh to provide the repo (which mock uses) and
the yum install devtoolset-gcc etc. I don't have a RHEL instance
running to check the repo on that, but the incantation is documented.
https://developers.redhat.com/products/developertoolset/hello-world#fndtn-windows
If you can't do one of those, devtoolset is irrelevant. In the patch it
was conditional on el7, and that passed %check on EPEL and Fedora, so I
don't understand this.
Yeah, the problems seem self-inflicted.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
