On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 12:35, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > LGPL has other implications towards proprietary software, and that's > > what the authors specifically want to protect, so that's a hard line. > > > > Wouldn't the Classpath Exception [1] be appropriate here? This > > wouldn't require the interpretation of a new legal text. > > > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/GPL_Classpath_Exception > > The Classpath Exception is at least as permissive as the LGPL, so if upstram > is not OK with the LGPL, they will not be OK with the Classpath Exception > either (at least they should not, rationally). They are going to apply this one: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#LinkingOverControlledInterface -- Iñaki Úcar _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
