Iñaki Ucar wrote: > LGPL has other implications towards proprietary software, and that's > what the authors specifically want to protect, so that's a hard line. > > Wouldn't the Classpath Exception [1] be appropriate here? This > wouldn't require the interpretation of a new legal text. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/GPL_Classpath_Exception The Classpath Exception is at least as permissive as the LGPL, so if upstram is not OK with the LGPL, they will not be OK with the Classpath Exception either (at least they should not, rationally). Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
