Re: PostgreSQL 13 - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15. 07. 20 9:03, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 08:09:22PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 9:17 PM Ben Cotton <bcotton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
== Contingency Plan ==

Modules will provide the functional version of PostgreSQL 12,
available to all users.

As Miro said - this is not a contingency plan.
We can't just ship a broken version of postgresql by default.

Default streams are not allowed in Fedora. Thus whatever content is shipped as
a module, it won't affect users by default. I cannot see a problem in shipping
a broken PostgreSQL in a module, since it's always an explicit user's choice
to enable, and install it. I understand the proposed contingency plan as
providing the broken server as an experimental stream.

The problem is not with shipping broken PostgreSQL in a module, but shipping broken PostgreSQL as non-modular default and having a contingency that says: "use modules".

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux