On Monday, July 13, 2020 2:59:24 AM MST Joe Orton wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 02:27:49PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > There's no reason to "update" any config, php-fpm is just an alternative > > option. mod_php still works well, and doesn't need to be replaced by those > > currently using it. It's still supported by the upstream, is still > > widely used in RHEL, Debian-based systems and so on, and has a few users > > in Fedora as well. It doesn't make sense to drop support for this. > > > > It'd be as simple as accepting ngompa's PR, here: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php/pull-request/4 > > > Remi has rejected the PR. There is really nothing more to discuss here, > and I cannot really see you are making a productive contribution to > technical debate in Fedora by continuing this thread, especially given > the misinformation which others have already had to correct. What "misinformation" are you referring to? > If you are struggling to adapt existing servers from mod_php to php-fpm > please use the users list to ask for help. I'm not going to be adapting servers from mod_php to php-fpm. mod_php works perfectly well, there's no reason to move away from it. > Fedora 33 will not include mod_php - end of story. That's really a shame, and I don't understand why anyone would choose to remove such functionality from Fedora. That really hurts Fedora, more than anything else, and it's entirely needless. This patch doesn't hurt the php package. -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
