Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
>
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are still
> problematic, they have all received several personal emails over the last few
> weeks and none but one reacted.
> I will likely start to ping FESCo about them starting next week.
> ...

 From a quick look to that list, there are some users that have no 
package assigned... I wonder if the unresponsive maintainer process 
implies the user to be removed from the packager group when their 
packages get orphaned and the user has no more any package associated to 
their account.

Here it is the list of packagers without any associated packages:
alen
gnikandrov
itsbill
jefferson2z
kir
pgibson
squallbayu
sturivnyi
yuwata


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux