Re: Emacs vs. XEmacs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 15:45 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> While it's true that both Emacs and XEmacs fail on a number of points
> for inclusion in Core such as using a modern toolkit¹,
I don't think *that* should be a criterion.
>  we should
> remember that one of the primary targets for Fedora Core is "free
> software hacker", and many, many of us still use an emacsen.
> 
> ¹ I'm aware of work to have Emacs and XEmacs use GTK+ for menus and
> such, but to really be useful they need to use e.g. Pango for buffer
> display.
The rpms made by Jens Petersen for Emacs 22.0.50 use GTK and seem to
work well. Emacs feels a little faster than XEmacs, it would be ok for
me to give up XEmacs, if the most important packages (auctex, again)
were included.
-- 
Gérard Milmeister
Langackerstrasse 49
CH-8057 Zürich


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux